Predictive Processing in Cognitive Robotics: a Review

TL;DR

This review analyzes the application of predictive processing frameworks in cognitive robotics, highlighting gaps in integration, learning models, control mechanisms, and dynamic prediction error tracking for advancing robotic cognition.

Contribution

It clarifies the distinctions among related schemes and identifies key research gaps in implementing predictive processing in cognitive robotics.

Findings

Robotics research needs to better integrate multiple sensory modalities.

Robotics models focus more on generative model learning than non-robotic models.

Limited exploration of control mechanisms and prediction error dynamics in robotics.

Abstract

Predictive processing has become an influential framework in cognitive sciences. This framework turns the traditional view of perception upside down, claiming that the main flow of information processing is realized in a top-down hierarchical manner. Furthermore, it aims at unifying perception, cognition, and action as a single inferential process. However, in the related literature, the predictive processing framework and its associated schemes such as predictive coding, active inference, perceptual inference, free-energy principle, tend to be used interchangeably. In the field of cognitive robotics there is no clear-cut distinction on which schemes have been implemented and under which assumptions. In this paper, working definitions are set with the main aim of analyzing the state of the art in cognitive robotics research working under the predictive processing framework as well as some related non-robotic models. The analysis suggests that, first, both research in cognitive robotics implementations and non-robotic models needs to be extended to the study of how multiple exteroceptive modalities can be integrated into prediction error minimization schemes. Second, a relevant distinction found here is that cognitive robotics implementations tend to emphasize the learning of a generative model, while in non-robotics models it is almost absent. Third, despite the relevance for active inference, few cognitive robotics implementations examine the issues around control and whether it should result from the substitution of inverse models with proprioceptive predictions. Finally, limited attention has been placed on precision weighting and the tracking of prediction error dynamics. These mechanisms should help to explore more complex behaviors and tasks in cognitive robotics research under the predictive processing framework.