Evaluating User Experiences in Mixed Reality
Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Susanne Putze, Valentin Schwind, Elisa D., Mekler, Jan David Smeddinck, Denise Kahl, Antonio Kr\"uger, Rainer Malaka

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges and diversity of measurement methods for user experience in mixed reality, emphasizing the need for standardized assessment tools in MR research.
Contribution
It provides a foundation for exchanging expertise and initiating discussions towards standardizing measurement methods in MR user studies.
Findings
Highlighting the diversity of measurement methods in MR
Identifying the lack of standardized tools for MR experience assessment
Proposing a workshop to foster consensus and standardization
Abstract
Measure user experience in MR (i.e., AR/VR) user studies is essential. Researchers apply a wide range of measuring methods using objective (e.g., biosignals, time logging), behavioral (e.g., gaze direction, movement amplitude), and subjective (e.g., standardized questionnaires) metrics. Many of these measurement instruments were adapted from use-cases outside of MR but have not been validated for usage in MR experiments. However, researchers are faced with various challenges and design alternatives when measuring immersive experiences. These challenges become even more diverse when running out-of-the lab studies. Measurement methods of VR experience recently received much attention. For example, research has started embedding questionnaires in the VE for various applications, allowing users to stay closer to the ongoing experience while filling out the survey. However, there is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
