Dynamical Masses and Stellar Evolutionary Model Predictions of M-Stars
Jamila Pegues, Ian Czekala, Sean M. Andrews, Karin I. \"Oberg, Gregory, J. Herczeg, Jennifer B. Bergner, L. Ilsedore Cleeves, Viviana V. Guzm\'an,, Jane Huang, Feng Long, Richard Teague, David J. Wilner

TL;DR
This study uses ALMA observations to measure dynamical masses of three M-stars, compares them with stellar models, and explores the impact of magnetic activity and starspots on mass predictions.
Contribution
First dynamical mass measurements for J0432+1827 and J1100-7619, and the most precise for FP Tau, highlighting discrepancies with standard models and the potential role of magnetic activity.
Findings
Fiducial models agree with J0432+1827 but underpredict FP Tau and J1100-7619 masses.
Adjusting effective temperatures by 40-340K can reconcile models with measurements.
Models incorporating starspots better reproduce dynamical masses.
Abstract
In this era of Gaia and ALMA, dynamical stellar mass measurements provide benchmarks that are independent of observations of stellar characteristics and their uncertainties. These benchmarks can then be used to validate and improve stellar evolutionary models, which can lead to both imprecise and inaccurate mass predictions for pre-main-sequence, low-mass stars. We present the dynamical stellar masses derived from disks around three M-stars (FP Tau, J0432+1827, and J1100-7619) using ALMA observations of CO (J=2--1) and CO (J=2--1) emission. These are the first dynamical stellar mass measurements for J0432+1827 and J1100-7619 and the most precise measurement for FP Tau. Fiducial stellar evolutionary model tracks, which do not include any treatment of magnetic activity, agree with the dynamical measurement of J0432+1827 but underpredict the mass by 60\% for FP Tau and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
