Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Making
Han Liu, Vivian Lai, Chenhao Tan

TL;DR
This study investigates how distribution shifts and interactive explanations affect human-AI team performance, revealing challenges in achieving reliable complementary decision-making in critical tasks.
Contribution
It introduces experimental designs accounting for out-of-distribution data and develops interactive explanation interfaces, providing new insights into human-AI collaboration dynamics.
Findings
Distribution shift impacts AI performance significantly.
Interactive explanations improve perceived usefulness but may reinforce biases.
Mixed effects observed on actual human-AI team performance.
Abstract
Although AI holds promise for improving human decision making in societally critical domains, it remains an open question how human-AI teams can reliably outperform AI alone and human alone in challenging prediction tasks (also known as complementary performance). We explore two directions to understand the gaps in achieving complementary performance. First, we argue that the typical experimental setup limits the potential of human-AI teams. To account for lower AI performance out-of-distribution than in-distribution because of distribution shift, we design experiments with different distribution types and investigate human performance for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution examples. Second, we develop novel interfaces to support interactive explanations so that humans can actively engage with AI assistance. Using virtual pilot studies and large-scale randomized experiments…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
