Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
Upol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael Muller, Mark O. Riedl, Justin D., Weisz

TL;DR
This paper introduces Social Transparency (ST), a sociotechnically informed approach to enhance explainability in AI systems by incorporating social and organizational context, aiming to improve trust and decision-making.
Contribution
It develops a conceptual framework for socially-situated XAI, expanding the design space by integrating socio-organizational factors into AI explainability.
Findings
ST can calibrate trust in AI systems
ST improves decision-making processes
ST facilitates organizational collective actions
Abstract
As AI-powered systems increasingly mediate consequential decision-making, their explainability is critical for end-users to take informed and accountable actions. Explanations in human-human interactions are socially-situated. AI systems are often socio-organizationally embedded. However, Explainable AI (XAI) approaches have been predominantly algorithm-centered. We take a developmental step towards socially-situated XAI by introducing and exploring Social Transparency (ST), a sociotechnically informed perspective that incorporates the socio-organizational context into explaining AI-mediated decision-making. To explore ST conceptually, we conducted interviews with 29 AI users and practitioners grounded in a speculative design scenario. We suggested constitutive design elements of ST and developed a conceptual framework to unpack ST's effect and implications at the technical,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
