Revisited cold gas content with atomic carbon [C I] in z=2.5 protocluster galaxies
Minju M. Lee, Ichi Tanaka, Daisuke Iono, Ryohei Kawabe, Tadayuki, Kodama, Kotaro Kohno, Toshiki Saito, Yoichi Tamura

TL;DR
This study uses atomic carbon [CI] observations to assess cold gas content in z=2.5 protocluster galaxies, comparing calibration methods and revealing environmental effects on gas depletion times.
Contribution
It demonstrates that [CI]-based gas mass estimates are consistent with CO and dust tracers in protocluster galaxies, confirming the applicability of field galaxy calibrations in dense environments.
Findings
[CI] gas measurements are comparable to CO-based estimates within calibration uncertainties.
Gas fractions in protocluster galaxies are similar to field galaxies for certain stellar masses.
Depletion times decrease more rapidly with stellar mass in protocluster galaxies, indicating earlier quenching.
Abstract
We revisit the cold gas contents of galaxies in a protocluster at z=2.49 using the lowest neutral atomic carbon transition [CI]P-P from Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations. We aim to test if the same gas mass calibration applied in field galaxies can be applied to protocluster galaxies. Five galaxies out of sixteen targeted galaxies are detected in the [CI] line, and these are all previously detected in CO(3-2) and CO(4-3) and three in 1.1 mm dust continuum. We investigate the line luminosity relations between CO and [CI] in the protocluster and compare them with other previous studies. We then compare the gas mass based on three gas tracers of [CI], CO(3-2), and dust if at least one of the last two tracers are available. Using the calibration adopted for field main-sequence galaxies, the [CI]-based gas measurements are lower than or comparable to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
