From dual-unitary to quantum Bernoulli circuits: Role of the entangling power in constructing a quantum ergodic hierarchy
S. Aravinda, Suhail Ahmad Rather, Arul Lakshminarayan

TL;DR
This paper explores the role of entangling power in dual-unitary quantum circuits, establishing conditions for mixing and Bernoulli properties, and provides methods to construct such operators with maximal entangling power.
Contribution
It introduces a condition based on entangling power that guarantees mixing and Bernoulli properties in quantum circuits, extending the ergodic hierarchy to the quantum Bernoulli level.
Findings
Maximized entangling power corresponds to Bernoulli circuits.
Local averaging over random unitaries reveals the dominant role of entangling power in mixing rates.
Constructed dual-unitary operators span the entire range of entangling power, including a coupled quantum cat map.
Abstract
Deterministic classical dynamical systems have an ergodic hierarchy, from ergodic through mixing, to Bernoulli systems that are "as random as a coin-toss". Dual-unitary circuits have been recently introduced as solvable models of many-body nonintegrable quantum chaotic systems having a hierarchy of ergodic properties. We extend this to include the apex of a putative quantum ergodic hierarchy which is Bernoulli, in the sense that correlations of single and two-particle observables vanish at space-time separated points. We derive a condition based on the entangling power of the basic two-particle unitary building block, , of the circuit, that guarantees mixing, and when maximized, corresponds to Bernoulli circuits. Additionally we show, both analytically and numerically, how local-averaging over random realizations of the single-particle unitaries, and such that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
