Arbitraging Narrow Bracketers
Francesco Fallucchi, Marc Kaufmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates how individuals treat choices narrowly or broadly, demonstrating that price variation across contexts can be exploited to identify and distinguish these decision-making patterns through experiments.
Contribution
It provides a formal framework to differentiate narrow and broad bracketing using price variation and introduces experimental methods to classify decision-making styles.
Findings
50.3% of subjects are narrow bracketers with monetary price variation
13.6% are narrow bracketers with violations of expected utility
26.3% are narrow bracketers with violations of the weak axiom
Abstract
Many important economic outcomes result from the combined effects of several choices, so the best option is not determined from each choice in isolation, but depends on how each choice alters total outcomes. We formally show that narrow bracketing -- treating choices in isolation -- can be distinguished from broad bracketing -- combining the choices -- if and only if there exist price variation across context: there is some bundle for which a person is willing to pay more in one choice than in another. In this case, a narrow bracketer can be arbitraged, buying the bundle when it is expensive and selling when it is cheap in simultaneous choices. We design and run two experiments to identify bracketing from price variation. In a between-subjects design where we vary the amount of work to generate price variation, we reject broad bracketing and fail to reject narrow bracketing. In a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation
