The Hidden Cost of Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for Research
Antonios Saravanos (1), Stavros Zervoudakis (1), Dongnanzi Zheng (1),, Neil Stott (2), Bohdan Hawryluk (1), Donatella Delfino (1) ((1) New York, University, (2) Cambridge Judge Business School)

TL;DR
This paper reveals that even highly rated Amazon Mechanical Turk workers exhibit significant inattentiveness, emphasizing the need for multiple attention checks and adjustments in research protocols to ensure data quality.
Contribution
It demonstrates the prevalence of inattentiveness among top-tier MTurk workers and advocates for improved attention checks and methodological adjustments in crowdsourced research.
Findings
22.3% of participants failed at least one attention check
Most failures were in honesty checks (94 participants)
Highlights the necessity of multiple attention checks regardless of worker reputation
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the attentiveness exhibited by participants sourced through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), thereby discovering a significant level of inattentiveness amongst the platform's top crowd workers (those classified as 'Master', with an 'Approval Rate' of 98% or more, and a 'Number of HITS approved' value of 1,000 or more). A total of 564 individuals from the United States participated in our experiment. They were asked to read a vignette outlining one of four hypothetical technology products and then complete a related survey. Three forms of attention check (logic, honesty, and time) were used to assess attentiveness. Through this experiment we determined that a total of 126 (22.3%) participants failed at least one of the three forms of attention check, with most (94) failing the honesty check - followed by the logic check (31), and the time check (27). Thus, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
