TL;DR
This study evaluates deep learning models for large-scale streamflow prediction in dam-influenced basins, highlighting the importance of dam characteristics and data pooling for improved accuracy.
Contribution
It demonstrates that pooling data from diverse basins enhances model performance and clarifies how to explicitly or implicitly model different dam types in streamflow prediction.
Findings
Median NSE of 0.74 for pooled data models
Small-dor basins behave differently from large-dor basins
Explicit modeling of large reservoirs improves accuracy
Abstract
A large fraction of major waterways have dams influencing streamflow, which must be accounted for in large-scale hydrologic modeling. However, daily streamflow prediction for basins with dams is challenging for various modeling approaches, especially at large scales. Here we examined which types of dammed basins could be well represented by long short-term memory (LSTM) models using readily-available information, and delineated the remaining challenges. We analyzed data from 3557 basins (83% dammed) over the contiguous United States and noted strong impacts of reservoir purposes, degree of regulation (dor), and diversion on streamflow modeling. While a model trained on a widely-used reference-basin dataset performed poorly for non-reference basins, the model trained on the whole dataset presented a median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) of 0.74. The zero-dor, small-dor (with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSigmoid Activation · Tanh Activation · Long Short-Term Memory
