The First Dynamical Mass Determination of a Nitrogen-rich Wolf-Rayet Star using a Combined Visual and Spectroscopic Orbit
Noel D. Richardson, Laura Lee, Gail Schaefer, Tomer Shenar, Andreas A., C. Sander, Grant M. Hill, Andrew G. Fullard, John D. Monnier, Narsireddy, Anugu, Claire L Davies, Tyler Gardner, Cyprien Lanthermann, Stefan Kraus, and, Benjamin R. Setterholm

TL;DR
This paper reports the first visual orbit and dynamical mass measurements for the nitrogen-rich Wolf-Rayet binary WR 133, combining interferometric, spectroscopic, and Gaia data to improve understanding of massive star evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first visual orbit for a WN star and combines multiple observational methods to derive stellar masses and orbital parameters.
Findings
Derived masses: WR star ~9.3 M_sun, O star ~22.6 M_sun.
First visual orbit for a WN star and third for a Wolf-Rayet star.
Masses are lower than expected from spectral types, suggesting binary interactions.
Abstract
We present the first visual orbit for the nitrogen-rich Wolf-Rayet binary, WR 133 (WN5o + O9I) based on observations made with the CHARA Array and the MIRC-X combiner. This orbit represents the first visual orbit for a WN star and only the third Wolf-Rayet star with a visual orbit. The orbit has a period of 112.8 d, a moderate eccentricity of 0.36, and a separation of = 0.79 mas on the sky. We combine the visual orbit with an SB2 orbit and Gaia parallax to find that the derived masses of the component stars are = and = , with the large errors owing to the nearly face-on geometry of the system combined with errors in the spectroscopic parameters. We also derive an orbital parallax that is identical to the {\it Gaia}-determined distance. We present a preliminary spectral analysis and atmosphere models of the component…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
