
TL;DR
This thesis explores the connection between subfactors, fusion categories, and conformal field theories, focusing on the Haagerup subfactor and developing new techniques to identify corresponding CFTs through lattice models.
Contribution
It introduces methods to construct CFTs from subfactors, especially the Haagerup subfactor, by analyzing fusion categories and their extensions to modular tensor categories.
Findings
No direct evidence of CFTs from the fusion categories of the Haagerup subfactor
Highlights the need to study unitary modular tensor categories for CFT correspondence
Provides techniques for calculating F-symbols for fusion categories
Abstract
This is a PhD Thesis on the connection between subfactors (more precisely, their corresponding fusion categories) and Conformal Field Theory (CFT). Besides being a mathematically interesting topic on its own, subfactors have also attracted the attention of physicists, since there is a conjectured correspondence between these and CFTs. Although there is quite a persuasive body of evidence for this conjecture, there are some gaps: there exists a set of exceptional subfactors with no known counterpart CFT. Hence, it is necessary to develop new techniques for building a CFT from a subfactor. Here, it is useful to study the underlying mathematical structure in more detail: The even parts of every subfactor give rise to two Unitary Fusion Categories (UFCs), and it is a promising direction to study quantum spin systems constructed from these categories to find a connection to CFTs. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
