Most numbers are not normal
Andrea Aveni, Paolo Leonetti

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that, from a topological perspective, most numbers in (0,1] are not normal, meaning their digit frequency sequences have complex accumulation behaviors in all bases.
Contribution
It extends Olsen's result by showing a stronger form of non-normality for most numbers and offers a streamlined proof along with analogues in analytic P-ideals and regular matrices.
Findings
Most numbers are not normal in a strong topological sense.
The set of such numbers is comeager in (0,1].
The frequency sequences have complex accumulation point structures.
Abstract
We show, from a topological viewpoint, that most numbers are not normal in a strong sense. More precisely, the set of numbers with the following property is comeager: for all integers and , the sequence of vectors made by the frequencies of all possibile strings of length in the -adic representation of has a maximal subset of accumulation points, and each of them is the limit of a subsequence with an index set of nonzero asymptotic density. This extends and provides a streamlined proof of the main result given by Olsen in [Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 137 (2004), 43--53]. We provide analogues in the context of analytic P-ideals and regular matrices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsadvanced mathematical theories · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
