The Stars Kepler Missed: Investigating the Kepler Target Selection Function Using Gaia DR2

TL;DR

This study uses Gaia DR2 data to reconstruct and analyze the Kepler target selection function, revealing biases related to stellar brightness, evolutionary state, and binarity, and confirming overall unbiased kinematic selection.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed reconstruction of Kepler's target selection function using Gaia data, identifying specific biases and confirming the effectiveness of target selection criteria.

Findings

High completeness for stars brighter than Kp < 14 mag.

Significant bias against low-luminosity red giants at fainter magnitudes.

Kepler selection shows bias against binaries based on RUWE values.

Abstract

The Kepler Mission revolutionized exoplanet science and stellar astrophysics by obtaining highly precise photometry of over 200,000 stars over 4 years. A critical piece of information to exploit Kepler data is its selection function, since all targets had to be selected from a sample of half a million stars on the Kepler CCDs using limited information. Here we use Gaia DR2 to reconstruct the Kepler selection function and explore possible biases with respect to evolutionary state, stellar multiplicity, and kinematics. We find that the Kepler target selection is nearly complete for stars brighter than $Kp < 14$ mag and was effective at selecting main-sequence stars, with the fraction of observed stars decreasing from 95% to 60% between $14 < Kp < 16$ mag. We find that the observed fraction for subgiant stars is only 10% lower, confirming that a significant number of subgiants selected for observation were believed to be main-sequence stars. Conversely we find a strong selection bias against low-luminosity red giant stars ($R \approx 3-5 R_\odot$, $T_{eff} \approx 5500$K), dropping from 90% at $Kp = 14$ mag to below 30% at $Kp = 16$ mag, confirming that the target selection was efficient at distinguishing dwarfs from giants. We compare the Gaia Re-normalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) values of the observed and non-observed main sequence stars and find a difference in elevated ($>$ 1.2) RUWE values at $\sim\,5\,\sigma$ significance, suggesting that the Kepler target selection shows some bias against either close or wide binaries. We furthermore use the Gaia proper motions to show that the Kepler selection function was unbiased with respect to kinematics.