Argument Schemes and Dialogue for Explainable Planning
Quratul-ain Mahesar, Simon Parsons

TL;DR
This paper introduces an argument scheme-based method for explainable AI planning, enabling interactive dialogues that help users understand and trust AI-generated plans through explanations and critical questions.
Contribution
It proposes novel argument schemes and a dialogue system for interactive, dialectical explanations in AI planning, enhancing transparency and user understanding.
Findings
Developed argument schemes for explaining plans
Created a dialogue system for interactive explanations
Facilitated user understanding of AI planning outputs
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly deployed in practical applications. However, there is a major concern whether AI systems will be trusted by humans. In order to establish trust in AI systems, there is a need for users to understand the reasoning behind their solutions. Therefore, systems should be able to explain and justify their output. In this paper, we propose an argument scheme-based approach to provide explanations in the domain of AI planning. We present novel argument schemes to create arguments that explain a plan and its key elements; and a set of critical questions that allow interaction between the arguments and enable the user to obtain further information regarding the key elements of the plan. Furthermore, we present a novel dialogue system using the argument schemes and critical questions for providing interactive dialectical explanations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Topic Modeling
