TL;DR
This paper establishes theoretical bounds on when quantum machine learning models outperform classical ones in predicting outcomes of quantum experiments, showing exponential advantages in certain scenarios.
Contribution
It provides the first information-theoretic bounds demonstrating conditions for quantum advantage in quantum machine learning prediction tasks.
Findings
Classical ML models need exponentially more data than quantum models for some tasks.
Quantum models can achieve accurate predictions with polynomially fewer resources.
The results clarify the potential and limits of quantum advantage in physical experiment predictions.
Abstract
We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend on an input parameter and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum process . Our figure of merit is the number of runs of required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome after each run of , and quantum ML models that can access coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data is then used to predict outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any input distribution , a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
