Constrained optimisation of preliminary spacecraft configurations under the design-for-demise paradigm
Mirko Trisolini, Hugh G. Lewis, Camilla Colombo

TL;DR
This paper enhances a multi-objective optimization framework for spacecraft design by incorporating constraints, enabling balanced solutions that address both demisability and survivability in early design stages.
Contribution
The work introduces constrained optimization into the existing multi-objective framework for spacecraft design, improving the trade-off analysis between demisability and survivability.
Findings
Successful application to tank assembly optimization
Effective balancing of demisability and survivability constraints
Improved preliminary design solutions for spacecraft
Abstract
In the past few years, the interest towards the implementation of design-for-demise measures has increased steadily. Most mid-sized satellites currently launched and already in orbit fail to comply with the casualty risk threshold of 0.0001. Therefore, satellites manufacturers and mission operators need to perform a disposal through a controlled re-entry, which has a higher cost and increased complexity. Through the design-for-demise paradigm, this additional cost and complexity can be removed as the spacecraft is directly compliant with the casualty risk regulations. However, building a spacecraft such that most of its parts will demise may lead to designs that are more vulnerable to space debris impacts, thus compromising the reliability of the mission. In fact, the requirements connected to the demisability and the survivability are in general competing. Given this competing nature,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
