Yet another argument in favour of NP=CoNP
Edward Hermann Haeusler

TL;DR
This paper presents multiple proofs demonstrating that NP equals CoNP, utilizing logic tautologies, proof complexity, and graph non-hamiltonicity, with implications for computational complexity theory.
Contribution
It introduces a novel proof of NP=CoNP based on polynomial-size, verifiable Dag-like certificates derived from natural deduction proofs.
Findings
Proof that NP=PSPACE implies NP=CoNP
Existence of polynomial-size, verifiable Dag certificates for tautologies
Linear upper bounds on proof heights facilitate the proofs
Abstract
This article shows yet another proof of NP=CoNP$. In a previous article, we proved that NP=PSPACE and from it we can conclude that NP=CoNP immediately. The former proof shows how to obtain polynomial and, polynomial in time checkable Dag-like proofs for all purely implicational Minimal logic tautologies. From the fact that Minimal implicational logic is PSPACE-complete we get the proof that NP=PSPACE. This first proof of NP=CoNP uses Hudelmaier linear upper-bound on the height of Sequent Calculus minimal implicational logic proofs. In an addendum to the proof of NP=PSPACE, we observe that we do not need to use Hudelmaier upper-bound since any proof of non-hamiltonicity for any graph is linear upper-bounded. By the CoNP-completeness of non-hamiltonicity, we obtain NP=CoNP as a corollary of the first proof. In this article we show the third proof of CoNP=NP, also providing polynomial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Database Systems and Queries · Logic, programming, and type systems
