Illumination Estimation Challenge: experience of past two years

TL;DR

This paper reviews the two-year experience of the Illumination Estimation Challenge, highlighting new datasets, diverse scene parameters, and the algorithms that achieved top results, advancing computational color constancy research.

Contribution

It introduces a large, diverse dataset and challenge framework that prevents biased tuning, fostering development of robust illumination estimation algorithms.

Findings

Winning algorithms improved accuracy across all tracks.

Diverse datasets helped identify scene-dependent challenges.

Results inform future research directions in color constancy.

Abstract

Illumination estimation is the essential step of computational color constancy, one of the core parts of various image processing pipelines of modern digital cameras. Having an accurate and reliable illumination estimation is important for reducing the illumination influence on the image colors. To motivate the generation of new ideas and the development of new algorithms in this field, the 2nd Illumination estimation challenge~(IEC\#2) was conducted. The main advantage of testing a method on a challenge over testing in on some of the known datasets is the fact that the ground-truth illuminations for the challenge test images are unknown up until the results have been submitted, which prevents any potential hyperparameter tuning that may be biased. The challenge had several tracks: general, indoor, and two-illuminant with each of them focusing on different parameters of the scenes. Other main features of it are a new large dataset of images (about 5000) taken with the same camera sensor model, a manual markup accompanying each image, diverse content with scenes taken in numerous countries under a huge variety of illuminations extracted by using the SpyderCube calibration object, and a contest-like markup for the images from the Cube+ dataset that was used in IEC\#1. This paper focuses on the description of the past two challenges, algorithms which won in each track, and the conclusions that were drawn based on the results obtained during the 1st and 2nd challenge that can be useful for similar future developments.