Higgs-mass predictions in the MSSM and beyond
P. Slavich, S. Heinemeyer, E. Bagnaschi, H. Bahl, M. Goodsell, H.E., Haber, T. Hahn, R. Harlander, W. Hollik, G. Lee, M. M\"uhlleitner, S., Pa{\ss}ehr, H. Rzehak, D. St\"ockinger, A. Voigt, C.E.M. Wagner, G., Weiglein, B.C. Allanach, T. Biek\"otter, S. Borowka, J. Braathen

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent advances in predicting Higgs boson masses within supersymmetric models, emphasizing improved theoretical accuracy driven by LHC measurements and collaborative efforts like KUTS.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of current Higgs-mass calculation methods, recent progress, and future prospects in supersymmetric theories, highlighting collaborative advancements.
Findings
Significant progress in Higgs mass prediction accuracy
Collaborative efforts like KUTS have advanced the field
Future improvements are outlined for theoretical calculations
Abstract
Predictions for the Higgs masses are a distinctive feature of supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model, where they play a crucial role in constraining the parameter space. The discovery of a Higgs boson and the remarkably precise measurement of its mass at the LHC have spurred new efforts aimed at improving the accuracy of the theoretical predictions for the Higgs masses in supersymmetric models. The "Precision SUSY Higgs Mass Calculation Initiative" (KUTS) was launched in 2014 to provide a forum for discussions between the different groups involved in these efforts. This report aims to present a comprehensive overview of the current status of Higgs-mass calculations in supersymmetric models, to document the many advances that were achieved in recent years and were discussed during the KUTS meetings, and to outline the prospects for future improvements in these calculations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
