Zeroth Law in Quantum Thermodynamics at Strong Coupling: `in Equilibrium', not `Equal Temperature'
Jen-Tsung Hsiang, Bei-Lok Hu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that at strong coupling in quantum thermodynamics, the traditional notion of equal temperature in equilibrium does not hold, proposing 'in equilibrium' as a more fundamental concept.
Contribution
It establishes that strong coupling leads to inequivalence of 'equal temperature' and 'in equilibrium', and introduces a generalized fluctuation-dissipation relation for such systems.
Findings
Effective temperature can differ from bath temperature at strong coupling.
Two systems can be in equilibrium but have different effective temperatures.
A generalized fluctuation-dissipation relation is valid at strong coupling.
Abstract
The zeroth law of thermodynamics involves a transitivity relation (pairwise between three objects) expressed either in terms of `equal temperature' (ET), or `in equilibrium' (EQ) conditions. In conventional thermodynamics conditional on vanishingly weak system-bath coupling these two conditions are commonly regarded as equivalent. In this work we show that for thermodynamics at strong coupling they are inequivalent: namely, two systems can be in equilibrium and yet have different effective temperatures. A recent result \cite{NEqFE} for Gaussian quantum systems shows that an effective temperature can be defined at all times during a system's nonequilibrium evolution, but because of the inclusion of interaction energy, after equilibration the system's is slightly higher than the bath temperature , with the deviation depending on the coupling. A second object…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
