TL;DR
This paper introduces neural networks to rapidly estimate covariance parameters in spatial Gaussian process models, achieving similar accuracy to maximum likelihood methods but with significantly reduced computational time.
Contribution
The work demonstrates that neural networks can effectively approximate ML estimates for covariance parameters, offering a scalable and efficient alternative for spatial data analysis.
Findings
Neural networks achieve similar accuracy to ML estimates.
Estimation speed is increased by a factor of 100 or more.
Method is applicable to climate science and can be extended to other spatial problems.
Abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are a popular model for spatially referenced data and allow descriptive statements, predictions at new locations, and simulation of new fields. Often a few parameters are sufficient to parameterize the covariance function, and maximum likelihood (ML) methods can be used to estimate these parameters from data. ML methods, however, are computationally demanding. For example, in the case of local likelihood estimation, even fitting covariance models on modest size windows can overwhelm typical computational resources for data analysis. This limitation motivates the idea of using neural network (NN) methods to approximate ML estimates. We train NNs to take moderate size spatial fields or variograms as input and return the range and noise-to-signal covariance parameters. Once trained, the NNs provide estimates with a similar accuracy compared to ML estimation and at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
