Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review
Nicola Perra

TL;DR
This paper reviews 347 articles on non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19, analyzing methodologies, data, and findings to understand behavioral changes and policy impacts in pandemic response.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification and synthesis of recent literature on NPIs during COVID-19, highlighting data sources, methodologies, and future research challenges.
Findings
Most studies used empirical data from tech and mobile sources.
NPIs significantly affected societal behaviors and transmission dynamics.
The review identifies gaps and opportunities for future research.
Abstract
Infectious diseases and human behavior are intertwined. On one side, our movements and interactions are the engines of transmission. On the other, the unfolding of viruses might induce changes to our daily activities. While intuitive, our understanding of such feedback loop is still limited. Before COVID-19 the literature on the subject was mainly theoretical and largely missed validation. The main issue was the lack of empirical data capturing behavioral change induced by diseases. Things have dramatically changed in 2020. Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been the key weapon against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and affected virtually any societal process. Travels bans, events cancellation, social distancing, curfews, and lockdowns have become unfortunately very familiar. The scale of the emergency, the ease of survey as well as crowdsourcing deployment guaranteed by the latest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
