ANTARES search for point-sources of neutrinos using astrophysical catalogs: a likelihood stacking analysis
A. Albert, M. Andr\'e, M. Anghinolfi, G. Anton, M. Ardid, J.-J., Aubert, J. Aublin, B. Baret, S. Basa, B. Belhorma, V. Bertin, S. Biagi, M., Bissinger, J. Boumaaza, M. Bouta, M.C. Bouwhuis, H. Branzas, R. Bruijn, J., Brunner, J. Busto, A. Capone, L. Caramete, J. Carr

TL;DR
This study used a likelihood stacking method on ANTARES data from 2007 to 2017 to search for neutrino point sources across various astrophysical catalogs, finding no significant associations but highlighting a potential signal from radio galaxies and a coincident blazar flare.
Contribution
The paper introduces a comprehensive likelihood stacking analysis of ANTARES data targeting multiple astrophysical source catalogs, including a joint analysis with IceCube data, to identify potential neutrino sources.
Findings
No significant neutrino source detection overall.
A 2.8 sigma pre-trial excess for radio galaxies.
A 2.0 sigma post-trial significance for a blazar with coincident flaring activity.
Abstract
A search for astrophysical point-like neutrino sources using the data collected by the ANTARES detector between January 29, 2007 and December 31, 2017 is presented. A likelihood stacking method is used to assess the significance of an excess of muon neutrinos inducing track-like events in correlation with the location of a list of possible sources. Different sets of objects are tested in the analysis: a) a sub-sample of the \textit{Fermi} 3LAC catalog of blazars, b) a jet-obscured AGN population, c) a sample of soft gamma-ray selected radio galaxies, d) a star-forming galaxy catalog , and e) a public sample of 56 very-high-energy track events from the IceCube experiment. None of the tested sources shows a significant association with the sample of neutrinos detected by ANTARES. The smallest p-value is obtained for the radio galaxies catalog with an equal weights hypothesis, with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
