Ensembles of Localised Models for Time Series Forecasting

TL;DR

This paper explores ensembling techniques to improve local adaptation in global forecasting models for time series, demonstrating significant accuracy gains across multiple datasets.

Contribution

It introduces a new clustered ensemble methodology combining various clustering techniques with different GFM types, enhancing local specificity in forecasts.

Findings

Clustered ensembles outperform baseline GFMs and univariate models.

Varied clustering techniques improve model localization.

Significant accuracy improvements on eight datasets.

Abstract

With large quantities of data typically available nowadays, forecasting models that are trained across sets of time series, known as Global Forecasting Models (GFM), are regularly outperforming traditional univariate forecasting models that work on isolated series. As GFMs usually share the same set of parameters across all time series, they often have the problem of not being localised enough to a particular series, especially in situations where datasets are heterogeneous. We study how ensembling techniques can be used with generic GFMs and univariate models to solve this issue. Our work systematises and compares relevant current approaches, namely clustering series and training separate submodels per cluster, the so-called ensemble of specialists approach, and building heterogeneous ensembles of global and local models. We fill some gaps in the existing GFM localisation approaches, in particular by incorporating varied clustering techniques such as feature-based clustering, distance-based clustering and random clustering, and generalise them to use different underlying GFM model types. We then propose a new methodology of clustered ensembles where we train multiple GFMs on different clusters of series, obtained by changing the number of clusters and cluster seeds. Using Feed-forward Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Networks, and Pooled Regression models as the underlying GFMs, in our evaluation on eight publicly available datasets, the proposed models are able to achieve significantly higher accuracy than baseline GFM models and univariate forecasting methods.