Minimum Excess Risk in Bayesian Learning
Aolin Xu, Maxim Raginsky

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of minimum excess risk (MER) in Bayesian learning, providing bounds and insights into how uncertainty and model richness affect learning performance, with implications for both parametric and nonparametric models.
Contribution
It defines MER as a measure of Bayesian learning performance gap and develops two methods to upper-bound MER, linking it to information measures and parameter estimation errors.
Findings
MER decays with more data, quantified by mutual information.
Model class richness influences MER in realizable models.
Parameter estimation errors directly impact the MER.
Abstract
We analyze the best achievable performance of Bayesian learning under generative models by defining and upper-bounding the minimum excess risk (MER): the gap between the minimum expected loss attainable by learning from data and the minimum expected loss that could be achieved if the model realization were known. The definition of MER provides a principled way to define different notions of uncertainties in Bayesian learning, including the aleatoric uncertainty and the minimum epistemic uncertainty. Two methods for deriving upper bounds for the MER are presented. The first method, generally suitable for Bayesian learning with a parametric generative model, upper-bounds the MER by the conditional mutual information between the model parameters and the quantity being predicted given the observed data. It allows us to quantify the rate at which the MER decays to zero as more data becomes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
