Present-Biased Optimization
Fedor V. Fomin, Pierre Fraigniaud, and Petr A. Golovach

TL;DR
This paper extends existing models of present-biased agents to analyze their behavior in various optimization tasks, providing bounds on their cost ratios and a comprehensive understanding of their decision-making patterns.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized framework for present-biased optimization, analyzing different scenarios and establishing bounds on cost ratios for various problem types.
Findings
Cost ratios vary significantly depending on problem constraints.
Extended analysis covers all combinations of cost underestimation/overestimation.
Provides upper bounds on cost ratios for multiple scenarios.
Abstract
This paper explores the behavior of present-biased agents, that is, agents who erroneously anticipate the costs of future actions compared to their real costs. Specifically, the paper extends the original framework proposed by Akerlof (1991) for studying various aspects of human behavior related to time-inconsistent planning, including procrastination, and abandonment, as well as the elegant graph-theoretic model encapsulating this framework recently proposed by Kleinberg and Oren (2014). The benefit of this extension is twofold. First, it enables to perform fine grained analysis of the behavior of present-biased agents depending on the optimisation task they have to perform. In particular, we study covering tasks vs. hitting tasks, and show that the ratio between the cost of the solutions computed by present-biased agents and the cost of the optimal solutions may differ significantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Complex Systems and Decision Making
