Size quantization of an exciton: A toy model of the "dead layer"
M. E. Raikh

TL;DR
This paper presents a theoretical analysis of exciton size quantization in large nanocrystals, revealing that the boundary reflection phase and a 'dead layer' significantly influence energy levels, especially when the hole is much heavier.
Contribution
It introduces an analytical model for exciton boundary reflection, highlighting the formation of a 'dead layer' where the hole does not reach the boundary, a novel insight into exciton boundary interactions.
Findings
Level positions are independent of Bohr radius for large nanocrystals.
The correction to levels depends on the boundary reflection phase.
A 'dead layer' larger than the Bohr radius forms due to slow hole motion near the boundary.
Abstract
Size-quantization levels of an exciton in large nanocrystals is studied theoretically. For the nanocrystal size, , much bigger than the Bohr radius, , the level positions do not depend on . The correction to the levels in a small parameter depends on the reflection phase of the exciton from the boundary. Calculation of this phase constitutes a three-body problem: electron, hole, and the boundary. This calculation can be performed analytically in the limit when the hole is much heavier than the electron. Physically, a slow motion of the hole towards the boundary takes place in the effective potential created by the fast motion of the electron orbiting the hole and touching the boundary. As a result, the hole is reflected before reaching the boundary. The distance of the closest approach of the hole to the boundary (the dead layer) exceeds parametrically.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
