Compatible braidings with Hopf links, multi-loop, and Borromean rings in $(3+1)$-dimensional spacetime
Zhi-Feng Zhang, Peng Ye

TL;DR
This paper develops a field-theoretical framework to classify compatible braiding phases in (3+1)D topological orders with discrete gauge groups, identifying which combinations are physically consistent and constructing all legitimate topological orders.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine mutually compatible braiding phases in (3+1)D topological orders, excluding illegitimate combinations via gauge invariance constraints, and explicitly classifies orders for various gauge groups.
Findings
Identified incompatible braiding phase combinations that violate gauge invariance.
Provided explicit classifications of topological orders for specific discrete gauge groups.
Extended the analysis to discuss braidings in (4+1)D spacetime.
Abstract
Braiding phases among topological excitations are key data for physically characterizing topological orders. In this paper, we provide a field-theoretical approach towards a complete list of mutually compatible braiding phases of topological orders in (3+1)D spacetime. More concretely, considering a discrete gauge group as input data, topological excitations in this paper are bosonic \particles carrying gauge charges and loops carrying gauge fluxes. Among these excitations, there are three classes of root braiding processes: particle-loop braidings (i.e., the familiar Aharonov-Bohm phase of winding an electric charge around a thin magnetic solenoid), multi-loop braidings [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 080403 (2014)], and particle-loop-loop braidings [i.e., Borromean Rings braiding in Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061601 (2018)]. A naive way to exhaust all topological orders is to arbitrarily combine…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
