
TL;DR
This paper investigates Neptune's early orbital migration and its impact on the Kuiper belt's structure, showing that moderate eccentricity excitation better explains observed distant KBOs than low-eccentricity models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Neptune's eccentricity was likely excited to around 0.1 during migration, influencing the Kuiper belt's orbital distribution in a way not explained by low-eccentricity models.
Findings
Low-eccentricity Neptune migration models fail to reproduce distant KBOs with specific orbital characteristics.
Moderate eccentricity (~0.1) in Neptune's orbit better explains the observed Kuiper belt structure.
Secular cycles and resonances, especially the nu_8 apsidal resonance, play a key role in lifting KBOs from the scattered disk.
Abstract
The dynamical structure of the Kuiper belt can be used as a clue to the formation and evolution of the Solar System, planetary systems in general, and Neptune's early orbital history in particular. The problem is best addressed by forward modeling where different initial conditions and Neptune's orbital evolutions are tested, and the model predictions are compared to orbits of known Kuiper belt objects (KBOs). It has previously been established that Neptune radially migrated, by gravitationally interacting with an outer disk of planetesimals, from the original radial distance r < 25 au to its current orbit at 30 au. Here we show that the migration models with a very low orbital eccentricity of Neptune e_N < 0.05 do not explain KBOs with semimajor axes 50 < a < 60 au, perihelion distances q > 35 au and inclinations i < 10 deg. If e_N < 0.05 at all times, the Kozai cycles control the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
