Intuitiveness in Active Teaching
Jan Philip G\"opfert, Ulrike Kuhl, Lukas Hindemith, Heiko Wersing,, Barbara Hammer

TL;DR
This paper investigates how intuitiveness affects human interaction with machine learning algorithms, proposing a theoretical framework and conducting a large-scale user study to evaluate teaching strategies and algorithm performance.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for intuitiveness in algorithms and empirically assesses human teaching effectiveness in a spatial learning task.
Findings
Intuitiveness significantly impacts human teaching success.
Different algorithms require different teaching strategies.
Large-scale user data reveals key factors influencing interaction efficiency.
Abstract
While Machine learning gives rise to astonishing results in automated systems, it is usually at the cost of large data requirements. This makes many successful algorithms from machine learning unsuitable for human-machine interaction, where the machine must learn from a small number of training samples that can be provided by a user within a reasonable time frame. Fortunately, the user can tailor the training data they create to be as useful as possible, severely limiting its necessary size -- as long as they know about the machine's requirements and limitations. Of course, acquiring this knowledge can in turn be cumbersome and costly. This raises the question of how easy machine learning algorithms are to interact with. In this work, we address this issue by analyzing the intuitiveness of certain algorithms when they are actively taught by users. After developing a theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
