Classification of bad pixels of the Hawaii-2RG detector of the ASTROnomical NearInfraRed CAMera
N.A. Maslennikova (1), N.I. Shatsky (1), A.M. Tatarnikov (1) ((1), Lomonosov Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow,, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for classifying bad pixels in the Hawaii-2RG detector of the ASTRONIRCAM infrared camera, based on readout differences, and analyzes their behavior over cooldown cycles.
Contribution
It introduces a new classification scheme for bad pixels using histogram analysis of readout differences and studies pixel behavior over cooldown cycles.
Findings
99.6% of pixels are normal
Bad pixel counts are stable over cooldown cycles
Hot pixels remain constant, others may migrate groups
Abstract
ASTRONIRCAM is an infrared camera-spectrograph installed at the 2.5-meter telescope of the CMO SAI. The instrument is equipped with the HAWAII-2RG array. A bad pixels classification of the ASTRONIRCAM detector is proposed. The classification is based on histograms of the difference of consecutive non-destructive readouts of a flat field. Bad pixels are classified into 5 groups: hot (saturated on the first readout), warm (the signal accumulation rate is above the mean value by more than 5 standard deviations), cold (the rate is under the mean value by more than 5 standard deviations), dead (no signal accumulation), and inverse (having a negative signal accumulation in the first readouts). Normal pixels of the ASTRONIRCAM detector account for 99.6% of the total. We investigated the dependence between the amount of bad pixels and the number of cooldown cycles of the instrument. While hot…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
