3d Convex Contact Forms And The Ruelle Invariant
Julian Chaidez, Oliver Edtmair

TL;DR
This paper establishes bounds relating the Ruelle invariant, volume, and systolic ratio for convex domains in four-dimensional space, and constructs examples of dynamically convex contact forms on S^3 that defy these bounds.
Contribution
It proves universal bounds connecting curvature, Ruelle invariant, and systolic ratio for convex domains, and constructs the first dynamically convex contact 3-spheres not contactomorphic to convex boundaries.
Findings
Established bounds involving Ruelle invariant, volume, and systolic ratio.
Constructed examples of dynamically convex contact forms on S^3 violating these bounds.
First examples of such contact forms not contactomorphic to convex boundaries.
Abstract
Let be a convex domain with smooth boundary . We use a relation between the extrinsic curvature of and the Ruelle invariant of the natural Reeb flow on to prove that there exist constants independent of such that \[c < \frac{\text{Ru}(Y)^2}{\text{vol}(X)} \cdot \text{sys}(Y) < C\] Here is the systolic ratio, i.e. the square of the minimal period of a closed Reeb orbit of divided by twice the volume of . We then construct dynamically convex contact forms on that violate this bound using methods of Abbondandolo-Bramham-Hryniewicz-Salom\~{a}o. These are the first examples of dynamically convex contact -spheres that are not strictly contactomorphic to a convex boundary .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
