Comparison of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Deep Learning Methods in Healthcare
Manish Gawali, Arvind C S, Shriya Suryavanshi, Harshit Madaan, Ashrika, Gaikwad, Bhanu Prakash KN, Viraj Kulkarni, Aniruddha Pant

TL;DR
This paper compares three privacy-preserving distributed deep learning methods in healthcare, introduces a new architecture called SplitFedv3, and proposes an improved training technique for better performance and efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces SplitFedv3, a novel distributed learning architecture, and a new training method called alternate mini-batch training, enhancing performance and efficiency.
Findings
SplitFedv3 outperforms split learning and SplitFedv2 in experiments.
Alternate mini-batch training improves over alternate client training.
The methods effectively balance privacy, performance, and computational costs.
Abstract
In this paper, we compare three privacy-preserving distributed learning techniques: federated learning, split learning, and SplitFed. We use these techniques to develop binary classification models for detecting tuberculosis from chest X-rays and compare them in terms of classification performance, communication and computational costs, and training time. We propose a novel distributed learning architecture called SplitFedv3, which performs better than split learning and SplitFedv2 in our experiments. We also propose alternate mini-batch training, a new training technique for split learning, that performs better than alternate client training, where clients take turns to train a model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
