Theory of weak symmetry breaking of translations in $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topologically ordered states and its relation to topological superconductivity from an exact lattice $\mathbb{Z}_2$ charge-flux attachment
Peng Rao, Inti Sodemann

TL;DR
This paper explores weak symmetry breaking in $ ext{Z}_2$ topologically ordered states with translational symmetry, revealing novel phenomena linked to topological superconductivity and providing exactly solvable models with Majorana boundary modes.
Contribution
It introduces a lattice $ ext{Z}_2$ charge-flux attachment approach to study weak symmetry breaking and constructs solvable models with Majorana boundary modes, connecting topological order and superconductivity.
Findings
Weak symmetry breaking occurs with fermionic spinons forming a 2D stack of Kitaev wires.
No local operator can move $ ext{Z}_2$ flux across a Kitaev wire without energy cost.
Constructed exactly solvable models with dispersive Majorana boundary modes.
Abstract
We study topologically ordered states enriched by translational symmetry by employing a recently developed 2D bosonization approach that implements an exact charge-flux attachment in the lattice. Such states can display `weak symmetry breaking' of translations, in which both the Hamiltonian and ground state remain fully translational invariant but the symmetry is `broken' by its anyon quasi-particles, in the sense that its action maps them into a different super-selection sector. We demonstrate that this phenomenon occurs when the fermionic spinons form a weak topological superconductor in the form of a 2D stack of 1D Kitaev wires, leading to the amusing property that there is no local operator that can transport the -flux quasi-particle across a single Kitaev wire of fermonic spinons without paying an energy gap in spite of the vacuum remaining fully…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
