Programmable quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms
Pascal Scholl, Michael Schuler, Hannah J. Williams, Alexander A., Eberharter, Daniel Barredo, Kai-Niklas Schymik, Vincent Lienhard, Louis-Paul, Henry, Thomas C. Lang, Thierry Lahaye, Andreas M. L\"auchli, and Antoine, Browaeys

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates programmable quantum simulation of a 2D antiferromagnetic system using up to 196 Rydberg atoms in optical tweezers, enabling exploration of many-body physics with high fidelity and versatility.
Contribution
The authors implement a large-scale, programmable quantum simulator for 2D antiferromagnets using Rydberg atoms, achieving unprecedented system size and control.
Findings
Achieved manipulation of up to 196 atoms with high fidelity.
Observed antiferromagnetic order through dynamic Hamiltonian tuning.
Good agreement with numerical models up to 100 particles.
Abstract
Quantum simulation using synthetic systems is a promising route to solve outstanding quantum many-body problems in regimes where other approaches, including numerical ones, fail. Many platforms are being developed towards this goal, in particular based on trapped ions, superconducting circuits, neutral atoms or molecules. All of which face two key challenges: (i) scaling up the ensemble size, whilst retaining high quality control over the parameters and (ii) certifying the outputs for these large systems. Here, we use programmable arrays of individual atoms trapped in optical tweezers, with interactions controlled by laser-excitation to Rydberg states to implement an iconic many-body problem, the antiferromagnetic 2D transverse field Ising model. We push this platform to an unprecedented regime with up to 196 atoms manipulated with high fidelity. We probe the antiferromagnetic order by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
