Observement as Universal Measurement
David G. Green, Kerri Morgan, Marc Cheong

TL;DR
This paper introduces 'observement', a generalized measurement framework that extends traditional measurement to non-numerical data like strings and graphs, enabling rigorous analysis across diverse data types.
Contribution
It formalizes a new measurement theory for non-numerical data, unifying various interpretive methods and revealing cross-disciplinary insights.
Findings
Non-numerical data can be rigorously measured using alternative mathematical models.
Existing widespread representations like strings and graphs are formalized within the observement framework.
The approach uncovers deep connections between different research fields through generalized measurement.
Abstract
Measurement theory is the cornerstone of science, but no equivalent theory underpins the huge volumes of non-numerical data now being generated. In this study, we show that replacing numbers with alternative mathematical models, such as strings and graphs, generalises traditional measurement to provide rigorous, formal systems (`observement') for recording and interpreting non-numerical data. Moreover, we show that these representations are already widely used and identify general classes of interpretive methodologies implicit in representations based on character strings and graphs (networks). This implies that a generalised concept of measurement has the potential to reveal new insights as well as deep connections between different fields of research.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Visualization and Analytics · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
