Measurement of transverse single-spin asymmetries of $\pi^0$ and electromagnetic jets at forward rapidity in 200 and 500 GeV transversely polarized proton-proton collisions
STAR Collaboration: J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins,, G. Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A., Aparin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G. Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S., Averichev, V. Bairathi, K. Barish, A. Behera, R. Bellwied

TL;DR
This paper measures transverse single-spin asymmetries of $^0$ and electromagnetic jets at forward rapidity in polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 and 500 GeV, revealing energy-independent behaviors and potential new physics mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of TSSA for $^0$ and jets at two energies, exploring initial and final state effects and comparing results to QCD models, highlighting discrepancies and new physics possibilities.
Findings
TSSA increases with Feynman-x and is energy-independent from 19.4 to 500 GeV.
$^0$ with no nearby particles have higher TSSA than inclusive $^0$.
Small Collins asymmetry inside jets suggests limited final-state spin effects.
Abstract
The STAR Collaboration reports measurements of the transverse single-spin asymmetry (TSSA) of inclusive at center-of-mass energies () of 200 GeV and 500 GeV in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions in the pseudo-rapidity region 2.7 to 4.0. The results at the two different energies show a continuous increase of the TSSA with Feynman-, and, when compared to previous measurements, no dependence on from 19.4 GeV to 500 GeV is found. To investigate the underlying physics leading to this large TSSA, different topologies have been studied. with no nearby particles tend to have a higher TSSA than inclusive . The TSSA for inclusive electromagnetic jets, sensitive to the Sivers effect in the initial state, is substantially smaller, but shows the same behavior as the inclusive asymmetry as a function of Feynman-. To investigate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
