An Empirical Evaluation On The Effectiveness Of Medicaid Expansion Across 49 States
Tung Yu Marco Chan

TL;DR
This study empirically evaluates the impact of Medicaid expansion under the ACA across 49 states from 2013 to 2016, finding no significant effects on health outcomes in expanding states.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous empirical analysis using Difference-in-Difference regressions to assess Medicaid expansion's causal effects on health outcomes.
Findings
No significant health outcome improvements in expansion states
Medicaid expansion did not significantly affect health metrics during 2013-2016
Results suggest limited short-term health benefits from expansion
Abstract
In 2014 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) introduced the expansion of Medicaid where states can opt to expand the eligibility for those in need of free health insurance. In this paper, we attempt to assess the effectiveness of Medicaid expansion on health outcomes of state populations using Difference-in-Difference (DD) regressions to seek for causal impacts of expanding Medicaid on health outcomes in 49 states. We find that in the time frame of 2013 to 2016, Medicaid expansion seems to have had no significant impact on the health outcomes of states that have chosen to expand.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Policy and Management · Global Health Care Issues · Global Health Workforce Issues
