Maximum deconstructibility in module categories
Sean Cox

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under Vopěnka's Principle, classes of Gorenstein projective modules are always precovering, establishing a maximal extent of deconstructibility in module categories and linking set-theoretic principles to module theory.
Contribution
It introduces a new top-down characterization of deconstructibility and shows that Vopěnka's Principle implies maximal deconstructibility of module classes.
Findings
Vopěnka's Principle implies all classes of X-Gorenstein projective modules are precovering.
It is impossible to prove the non-precovering nature of Ding or Gorenstein projectives without Vopěnka's Principle.
The paper establishes a maximum level of deconstructibility in module categories under set-theoretic assumptions.
Abstract
We prove that Vop\v{e}nka's Principle implies that for every class of modules over any ring, the class of \textbf{-Gorenstein Projective modules} (\textbf{-}) is a special precovering class. In particular, it is not possible to prove (unless Vop\v{e}nka's Principle is inconsistent) that there is a ring over which the \textbf{Ding Projectives} () or the \textbf{Gorenstein Projectives} () do not form a precovering class (\v{S}aroch previously obtained this result for the class , using different methods). The key innovation is a new "top-down" characterization of \emph{deconstructibility}, which is a well-known sufficient condition for a class to be precovering. We also prove that Vop\v{e}nka's Principle implies, in some sense,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
