Voting of predictive models for clinical outcomes: consensus of algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data and an analysis of the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019
Matthew A. Reyna, Gari D. Clifford

TL;DR
This paper develops an ensemble voting algorithm from 70 models to improve early sepsis prediction from clinical data, demonstrating superior performance and generalization over individual models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel ensemble method combining multiple algorithms for sepsis prediction, emphasizing boosting from strong learners and demonstrating improved accuracy.
Findings
Ensemble outperforms individual models on test data.
Ensemble generalizes better to unseen data.
Boosting from strong learners enhances prediction accuracy.
Abstract
Although there has been significant research in boosting of weak learners, there has been little work in the field of boosting from strong learners. This latter paradigm is a form of weighted voting with learned weights. In this work, we consider the problem of constructing an ensemble algorithm from 70 individual algorithms for the early prediction of sepsis from clinical data. We find that this ensemble algorithm outperforms separate algorithms, especially on a hidden test set on which most algorithms failed to generalize.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
