Phase retrieval by projections in R^n requires 2n-2 projections (This paper has a gap)
Peter G. Casazza, Dorsa Ghoreishi

TL;DR
This paper proves that at least 2n-2 projections are necessary for phase retrieval in n-dimensional real space, resolving a major open problem in the field.
Contribution
It establishes a sharp lower bound of 2n-2 projections needed for phase retrieval in R^n, filling a key gap in the theoretical understanding.
Findings
Proves the necessity of at least 2n-2 projections for phase retrieval.
Provides a definitive lower bound resolving an open problem.
Advances theoretical understanding of phase retrieval requirements.
Abstract
We will answer the most significant open problem in real phase retrieval by projections by showing it requires at least projections to do phase retrieval in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
