Determination of the helpfulness of physics exam study methods
Rahul Jilakara, David P. Waters

TL;DR
This study investigates which physics exam study methods students find most helpful and correlates these methods with exam performance to recommend more effective study strategies.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence linking self-rated helpful study methods to actual exam performance and offers practical study advice for students.
Findings
Helpful study methods correlate with higher exam scores
Students' perceptions of helpfulness align with actual performance
Recommendations improve students' study efficiency
Abstract
Studying for physics exams can be difficult and stressful, especially during a student's introductory year in physics. For students who do not plan to major in physics, the desire to do well is based less on understanding concepts and more on achieving a better grade. For this reason, students want to study as efficiently as possible by using the most optimal study methods. We have taken surveys over the past three years to determine how students study for exams and compared that to their exam grades. We found that students who studied using methods that they rated as more helpful did better on the exams. By utilizing the study results, we are able to present our current and future students with study methods that have been rated as being more helpful, and give them advice on ways to optimize their study time for exams.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
