Switchbacks: statistical properties and deviations from alfv\'enicity
A. Larosa, V. Krasnoselskikh, T. Dudok de Wit{\i}nst, O. Agapitov, C., Froment, V. K. Jagarlamudi, M. Velli, S. D. Bale, A. W. Case, K. Goetz, Keith, P. Harvey, J. C. Kasper, K. E. Korreck, D. E. Larson, R. J. MacDowall, D., Malaspina, M. Pulupa, C. Revillet, M. L. Stevens

TL;DR
This study analyzes the statistical properties and boundaries of solar wind switchbacks, revealing their mostly alfvénic nature, compressibility, and potential links to instabilities like the firehose, providing insights into their generation mechanisms.
Contribution
It offers a detailed statistical and boundary analysis of switchbacks, highlighting their alfvénic and compressible features and proposing possible generation mechanisms.
Findings
73% of switchbacks are alfvénic
27% are compressible
Boundaries resemble rotational or tangential discontinuities
Abstract
{Parker Solar Probe's first solar encounter has revealed the presence of sudden magnetic field deflections that are called switchbacks and are associated with proton velocity enhancements in the slow alfv\'{e}nic solar wind.} {We study their statistical properties with a special focus on their boundaries.} {Using data from SWEAP and FIELDS we investigate particle and wavefield properties. The magnetic boundaries are analyzed with the minimum variance technique.} {Switchbacks are found to be alfv\'{e}nic in 73\% of the cases and compressible in 27\%. The correlations between magnetic field magnitude and density fluctuations reveal the existence of both positive and negative correlations, and the absence of perturbations of the magnetic field magnitude. Switchbacks do not lead to a magnetic shear in the ambient field. Their boundaries can be interpreted in terms of rotational or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
