Research Reproducibility as a Survival Analysis
Edward Raff

TL;DR
This paper proposes modeling research reproducibility as a survival analysis problem, offering a nuanced understanding of reproducibility dynamics over time rather than a binary classification.
Contribution
It introduces a novel survival analysis framework for research reproducibility, providing new insights into the temporal aspects of reproducibility in machine learning.
Findings
Reproducibility varies over time and can be modeled as a survival process.
The survival analysis approach reveals patterns not captured by binary models.
Longitudinal data analysis improves understanding of reproducibility trends.
Abstract
There has been increasing concern within the machine learning community that we are in a reproducibility crisis. As many have begun to work on this problem, all work we are aware of treat the issue of reproducibility as an intrinsic binary property: a paper is or is not reproducible. Instead, we consider modeling the reproducibility of a paper as a survival analysis problem. We argue that this perspective represents a more accurate model of the underlying meta-science question of reproducible research, and we show how a survival analysis allows us to draw new insights that better explain prior longitudinal data. The data and code can be found at https://github.com/EdwardRaff/Research-Reproducibility-Survival-Analysis
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Methodstravel james · Attentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
