Learning goals and perceived irrelevance to major within life science majors in introductory physics
Andrew J. Mason

TL;DR
This study explores how perceived relevance of introductory physics to life science majors affects their attitudes and learning outcomes, highlighting that perceived relevance correlates with more expert-like attitude shifts.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the impact of perceived course relevance on attitude shifts among life science majors in physics courses.
Findings
Students perceiving relevance show more positive attitude shifts.
Biology and health science majors exhibit similar trends.
Achievement goals influence perception and attitude changes.
Abstract
In a previous study, students' self-expressed learning orientations towards an exercise centered on self-monitoring one's ability to solve a pre-lab physics problem were identified from a post-test feedback survey given to an introductory algebra-based physics student population spanning six measured semesters, and examined as a potential variable in course performance, force and motion conceptual understanding, and attitudes towards learning physics. The sampled population, which primarily consists of life science majors, was also asked in the same feedback survey to discuss what portion or portions of the course were relevant to their respective choices of major. In this study, we examine the fact that about 50 students out of 218 sampled students, or 23% of the sample population, explicitly stated that they perceived no relevance at all of the course to their respective majors,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
