Simple and statistically sound recommendations for analysing physical theories
Shehu S. AbdusSalam, Fruzsina J. Agocs, Benjamin C. Allanach, Peter, Athron, Csaba Bal\'azs, Emanuele Bagnaschi, Philip Bechtle, Oliver, Buchmueller, Ankit Beniwal, Jihyun Bhom, Sanjay Bloor, Torsten Bringmann,, Andy Buckley, Anja Butter, Jos\'e Eliel Camargo-Molina

TL;DR
This paper provides physicists with straightforward, statistically sound methods and practical guidance for analyzing complex physical theories involving many parameters, addressing common pitfalls of ad hoc approaches.
Contribution
It introduces clear, simple statistical inference techniques and recommends accessible software tools to improve analysis accuracy in physical sciences.
Findings
Identifies issues with traditional ad hoc methods in high-dimensional spaces.
Proposes statistically rigorous alternatives for parameter estimation.
Provides reproducible examples and software resources.
Abstract
Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by multiple experiments, and random or grid sampling of model parameters. Whilst these methods are easy to apply, they exhibit pathologies even in low-dimensional parameter spaces, and quickly become problematic to use and interpret in higher dimensions. In this article we give clear guidance for going beyond these procedures, suggesting where possible simple methods for performing statistically sound inference, and recommendations of readily-available software tools and standards that can assist in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
