Sensitivity and depth of investigation from Monte Carlo ensemble statistics
Christin Bobe, Johannes Keller, Ellen Van De Vijver

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new sensitivity measure for Monte Carlo geophysical inversions based on covariance analysis, which does not require additional forward model computations and helps assess depth of investigation.
Contribution
It proposes a covariance-based sensitivity measure for Monte Carlo methods, bridging the gap where differential sensitivity is not directly available, and analyzes its properties for linear and non-linear models.
Findings
Covariance-based sensitivity measure aligns with differential sensitivity in linear models.
The measure is computationally efficient, requiring no extra forward model runs.
Behavior in non-linear models is characterized through simple and electromagnetic examples.
Abstract
For many geophysical measurements, such as direct current or electromagnetic induction methods, information fades away with depth. This has to be taken into account when interpreting models estimated from such measurements. For that reason, a measurement sensitivity analysis and determining the depth of investigation are standard steps during geophysical data processing. In deterministic gradient-based inversion, the most used sensitivity measure, the differential sensitivity, is readily available since these inversions require the computation of Jacobian matrices. In contrast, differential sensitivity may not be readily available in Monte Carlo inversion methods, since these methods do not necessarily include a linearization of the forward problem. Instead, a prior ensemble is used to simulate an ensemble of forward responses. Then, the prior ensemble is updated according to Bayesian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
