
TL;DR
This paper reviews publicly available computational tools for analyzing dark matter models, focusing on their capabilities to handle various phenomenologies and guide researchers in model-data comparison.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of existing dark matter computational codes, highlighting their strengths and limitations for different dark sector models.
Findings
Most codes effectively model WIMP phenomenology
Limited tools for strongly self-interacting dark matter
Guidance on selecting suitable codes for specific models
Abstract
Whilst the need for dark matter was established almost a century ago, only its gravitational interaction has been confirmed so far, allowing for plethora of models for dark matter. The Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) category has received by far the biggest attention, however despite the enormous experimental efforts, these particles remain elusive. The attention of the community has hence moved on to investigate the dark matter landscape over a much larger number of models with varying degrees of resemblances and differences in their predictions. This calls for the need to organise the various facets of dark matter models and their signatures, in order to maximise the experimental sensitivity and to select the models which are compatible with existing data. In this paper, I provide a short review of the most widespread public codes capable of computing dark matter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
