Uncertainty Quantification in Case of Imperfect Models: A Review
Sebastian Kersting, Michael Kohler

TL;DR
This review discusses methods for quantifying uncertainty in complex systems when models are imperfect, emphasizing techniques that incorporate observed data to address model inadequacy, with applications demonstrated in mechanical engineering.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of techniques that account for model imperfections in uncertainty quantification, with practical comparisons in mechanical engineering contexts.
Findings
Techniques effectively incorporate observed data to improve uncertainty estimates.
Comparison of methods highlights strengths and limitations in practical applications.
Illustrative examples demonstrate applicability in mechanical engineering.
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification of complex technical systems is often based on a computer model of the system. As all models such a computer model is always wrong in the sense that it does not describe the reality perfectly. The purpose of this article is to give a review of techniques which use observed values of the technical systems in order to take into account the inadequacy of a computer model in uncertainty quantification. The techniques reviewed in this article are illustrated and compared by applying them to applications in mechanical engineering.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
